A simple agreement was reached between the parties to defer the registration of the rent of the facts. In cases where the amdani was found to have been concealed in order to reduce the assessment of property revenues, the court found that it nullifies the provisions of the Registration Act, the Stamp Act and the Transfer of Ownership Act.  If a simple sentence is imposed, the difficulty must be closely examined.  If, in such cases, the protection of the community is the source of such taxation, the violation of the illegality of the law of the statutes is illegal.  Registration in the case of the lender is an example.  Therefore, the courts must assess all the circumstances before characterizing something so opposed. Similarly, agreements that violate the public service are generally considered to be contrary to public policy. Such an agreement is contrary to the aspect of the common good.  7. Contract 2 (h): A legally enforceable contract is a contract. But actions such as subletting are not contrary to public policy. They are valid under the legal system.  On the other hand, acts such as the appeasement of prosecutions and the taking of funds by the prosecutor to end the criminal proceedings would make the agreement against public order.
 a) A agrees to sell his house to B for 10,000 rupees. Here is B`s promise to pay the sum of 10,000 rupees, the consideration for A`s promise to sell the house, and A`s promise to sell the house is the counterpart of Bes` promise to pay the 10,000 rupees. These are legitimate considerations. The term “object” used in section 23 means “object” and does not make sense in the same sense as “reflection.” For this reason, the consideration of a contract may be legal and real, but this will not prevent the contract from being illegal if the purpose (object) of the contract is illegal. Section 23 limits jurisdictions to the purpose of the agreement or the transaction itself, as the section is not motivated by the motive, and not to the motives that flow from it. (f) A promises B a job in the public service, and B promises to pay 1,000 rupees to A. The agreement is null and forth, because the consideration is illegal. 3. In Re: K.L. Gauba (23.04.1954 – BOMHC) [AIR 1954 Bom 478]. Para 11: “… The freedom of the citizen, as well as the freedom of the lawyer to enter into a contract, is always subject to the public order imperatives as expressed in page 23 of the Indian Contract Act.
This freedom is also subject to the other considerations set out in question 23. Silence does not mean per-se communication Bank of India Ltd. Vs. Rustom Cowasjee- AIR 1955 Bom. 419 at page 430; 57 Bom. L.R. 850- Simple silence cannot be consent. It is not even a presentation to which an Estoppel remedy can be found, unless there is an obligation to make a statement or to make a free deed, and the supplier does not agree “23. What are the considerations and objects that are legitimate and what is not. – The reflection or the purpose of an agreement is legal, unless a car cannot drive without fuel, a contract without consideration would be incomplete. But if the statutes provide for a particular condition, the car can operate without fuel.
One example is the Agency.  An agreement must be supported by a legal review of both parties. The bulk of the existing counterparty must contain:- 5. Considering 2, letter d): if the promise or any other person has made or renounced something at the request of the promise, or refrains from making or refraining from making or refraining from any action, this is designated as a consideration for the promise. Price paid by one party for the promise of the other technical word meaning QUID-PRO-QUO, i.e. something in return. Where an agreement is merely a guarantee for another agreement or constitutes aid that facilitates the implementation of the purpose of the other agreement, which, although cancelled, is not prohibited by law, it can be applied as a guarantee contract.