A transaction contract is generally used as part of the termination of employment, but it is not necessarily used. A transaction agreement could be used even if employment continues, but both parties want to resolve a dispute between them. A transaction contract is a legally binding contract between the employer and the worker, which may have rights that the worker may have against his employer. Why does the transaction contract contain a long list of irrelevant receivables? Most employers (and their lawyers) use standard billing agreements designed to be “unit-friendly.” If there are certain claims that are obviously more likely to be applicable in your circumstances, they are sometimes mentioned separately in the agreement. They are sometimes referred to as “special claims.” Unfair dismissal is the most common, but if you resigned in the context of a health problem, discrimination on the basis of disability would also be a special right. Is that really all I need to know about agreements? In criminal matters, the next parallel to a transaction is a plea, although it is different on several important points, including the ability of the presiding judge to refuse the terms of a transaction. In Israel, which is a common law jurisdiction, transactions are almost always before the court and the court will generally ensure that the transaction has the effect of a judgment when the transaction is submitted to the court: a) only by bringing the transaction to court. Any billing agreement you use must be tailored to the employee concerned and their individual circumstances. They must include a clearly expressed waiver of the specific rights that the worker has or may possibly have. If the transaction contract does not meet all the legal requirements, it is not a valid regulation and leaves the worker open to asserting rights against the employer. It is therefore important to be very diligent in the development of the agreement. Who are the ACAS and what is their role in the transaction agreements? A “comprehensive settlement” is a “comprehensive settlement” that has been the subject of actions or charges in several jurisdictions and is defined as “a legal agreement that challenges or compromises both civil rights and criminal charges against a company or other large entity.”  Examples of an overall comparison are the $46 tobacco master settlement agreement between attorneys general.